![]() wrote on behalf of the majority.Īpplying intermediate scrutiny, the majority concluded that the Texas system did not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. “This is not a proper case in which to examine a State’s laws under standards of strict judicial scrutiny, since that test is reserved for cases involving laws that operate to the disadvantage of suspect classes or interfere with the exercise of fundamental rights and liberties explicitly or implicitly protected by the Constitution,” Justice Lewis F. Supreme Court Decision in San Antonio Independent School District v Rodriguezīy a vote of 5-4, the Court reversed. The court also concluded that appellants failed even to demonstrate a reasonable or rational basis for the State’s system. The District Court, finding that wealth is a “suspect” classification and that education is a “fundamental” right, concluded that the system could be upheld only upon a showing, which the school district failed to make, that there was a compelling state interest for the system. ![]() Accordingly, the suit further alleged that the financing system violated equal protection requirements because of substantial inter-district disparities in per-pupil expenditures resulting primarily from differences in the value of assessable property among the districts. The class-action suit was brought on behalf of school children from poor families who resided in school districts with a low property tax base, making the claim that the Texas system’s reliance on local property taxation favored the more affluent. Each district supplemented state aid through an ad valorem tax on property within its jurisdiction. ![]() Almost half of the revenues were derived from a largely state-funded program designed to provide a basic minimum educational offering in every school. In the 1970s, the financing of public elementary and secondary schools in Texas was a product of state and local participation. Facts of San Antonio Independent School District v Rodriguez Accordingly, the Court held that San Antonio Independent School District’s school financing system did not run afoul of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. Constitution that triggered strict scrutiny. Supreme Court held that the right to education was not a fundamental right under the U.S. In San Antonio Independent School District v Rodriguez, 411 U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |